Polski
УкраїнськаFlat prices in in August 2025
The median price of a flat in Poland in June ‑ August 2025 was PLN 9,095/m², 10.6% more than a year earlier. On the secondary market (resale), prices are rising in 67 and falling in 11 of the 102 cities and municipalities (gminas) compared.
Where prices are rising fastest
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Września | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 8,169 | +28.9% | 52 |
| 2 | Dobra (Szczecińska) municipality (gmina) | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 8,942 | +19.2% | 62 |
| 3 | Brzeg | Opolskie Voivodeship | 6,742 | +16.3% | 73 |
| 4 | Ostróda | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 6,595 | +15.2% | 68 |
| 5 | Leszno | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,903 | +14.3% | 80 |
| 6 | Oława | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 8,980 | +14.1% | 57 |
| 7 | Ostrów Wielkopolski | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 5,851 | +12.7% | 70 |
| 8 | Kalisz | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,735 | +11.5% | 113 |
| 9 | Mińsk Mazowiecki | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 10,057 | +11.4% | 71 |
| 10 | Żukowo | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 9,812 | +10.4% | 72 |
| 11 | Starachowice | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 5,263 | +10.2% | 63 |
| 12 | Pruszcz Gdański | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 10,456 | +9.7% | 74 |
| 13 | Żyrardów | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 8,284 | +9.7% | 60 |
| 14 | Oleśnica | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 8,082 | +9.2% | 62 |
| 15 | Świdnica | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 6,868 | +8.8% | 89 |
Where prices are falling or rising most slowly
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ząbkowice Śląskie | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 3,771 | -17.7% | 50 |
| 2 | Piotrków Trybunalski | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 5,930 | -5.6% | 73 |
| 3 | Kołobrzeg | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 10,312 | -5.1% | 120 |
| 4 | Lębork | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 5,747 | -3.9% | 70 |
| 5 | Chorzów | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,447 | -3.8% | 171 |
| 6 | Warsaw | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 16,363 | -3.7% | 3919 |
| 7 | Iława | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 6,967 | -2.4% | 57 |
| 8 | Jastrzębie-Zdrój | Śląskie Voivodeship | 4,406 | -2.4% | 63 |
| 9 | Kraków | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 14,517 | -2.3% | 1651 |
| 10 | Tczew | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 7,287 | -2.2% | 104 |
| 11 | Siemianowice Śląskie | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,479 | -1.7% | 99 |
| 12 | Wrocław | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 12,380 | -1.3% | 1625 |
| 13 | Bielsko-Biała | Śląskie Voivodeship | 7,907 | -1.3% | 154 |
| 14 | Wieliczka | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 11,917 | -1.3% | 51 |
| 15 | Gdynia | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 11,410 | -0.9% | 528 |
Most and least expensive large markets
Localities with at least 100 transactions in June ‑ August 2025.
| Locality | Median PLN/m² | Year on year | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warsaw | 15,062 | -4.8% | 7723 |
| Kraków | 14,662 | +5.3% | 2824 |
| Gdańsk | 12,970 | +14.9% | 2627 |
| Wrocław | 12,480 | +3.1% | 3163 |
| Pruszków | 12,467 | +20.8% | 135 |
| Ząbki | 12,144 | +4% | 130 |
| Piaseczno | 11,764 | +13.5% | 146 |
| Gdynia | 11,690 | +1.9% | 870 |
| Kołobrzeg | 10,403 | +14.1% | 286 |
| Marki | 10,349 | +24.2% | 124 |
| Lublin | 10,209 | +3.6% | 634 |
| Szczecin | 9,903 | +4.2% | 908 |
| Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | 9,867 | +4.1% | 142 |
| Rzeszów | 9,815 | +13.3% | 1031 |
| Katowice | 9,730 | +2.3% | 951 |
| Białystok | 9,685 | +6.4% | 1702 |
| Wieliczka | 9,446 | -1.5% | 139 |
| Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | 9,441 | +8.4% | 201 |
| Opole | 9,377 | +5% | 296 |
| Kielce | 9,293 | +9.7% | 581 |
| Dopiewo municipality (gmina) | 9,260 | +14.9% | 150 |
| Rumia | 9,214 | +12.5% | 267 |
| Oława | 9,194 | +20.5% | 127 |
| Komorniki municipality (gmina) | 9,152 | +7.1% | 168 |
| Żukowo | 9,030 | +29.9% | 111 |
| Toruń | 9,011 | +3.7% | 575 |
| Olsztyn | 8,925 | +3% | 573 |
| Łódź | 8,847 | +5.7% | 2313 |
| Siedlce | 8,804 | -1.8% | 133 |
| Oleśnica | 8,707 | +16.5% | 112 |
| Grodzisk Mazowiecki | 8,500 | -7.4% | 159 |
| Pruszcz Gdański | 8,400 | -12.1% | 253 |
| Luboń | 8,398 | +5% | 220 |
| Siechnice | 8,329 | +12.5% | 240 |
| Płock | 8,211 | +10.7% | 280 |
| Swarzędz | 8,142 | +8.2% | 118 |
| Bielsko-Biała | 8,132 | +3.9% | 204 |
| Piła | 7,933 | +28% | 218 |
| Reda | 7,927 | -5.3% | 122 |
| Tychy | 7,819 | +1% | 197 |
| Września | 7,767 | +11.6% | 108 |
| Słupsk | 7,595 | +9% | 349 |
| Gliwice | 7,559 | +7.9% | 415 |
| Leszno | 7,374 | +16.3% | 132 |
| Świdnica | 7,371 | +10.3% | 116 |
| Tczew | 7,354 | -1.8% | 106 |
| Lubin | 7,299 | +13.1% | 186 |
| Tarnów | 7,264 | +10.6% | 164 |
| Stargard | 7,254 | +5.9% | 201 |
| Koszalin | 7,220 | +1.7% | 211 |
| Brzeg | 7,142 | +8.2% | 114 |
| Radom | 6,888 | -1.8% | 240 |
| Elbląg | 6,845 | +3.2% | 568 |
| Kalisz | 6,783 | +1.8% | 214 |
| Częstochowa | 6,677 | -2.7% | 371 |
| Siemianowice Śląskie | 6,662 | +17% | 145 |
| Malbork | 6,410 | +6.8% | 129 |
| Ostrów Wielkopolski | 6,369 | +14.2% | 113 |
| Legnica | 6,347 | +6% | 212 |
| Włocławek | 6,286 | -1.2% | 191 |
| Głogów | 6,189 | +5.9% | 147 |
| Konin | 6,148 | +9.2% | 236 |
| Rybnik | 6,056 | -4.2% | 144 |
| Zabrze | 5,963 | +17.3% | 353 |
| Nowa Sól | 5,915 | -1.2% | 104 |
| Dąbrowa Górnicza | 5,792 | -9.9% | 135 |
| Sosnowiec | 5,744 | -6.2% | 300 |
| Będzin | 5,715 | -2.7% | 107 |
| Chorzów | 5,655 | ±0% | 258 |
| Inowrocław | 5,561 | +4.3% | 110 |
| Ruda Śląska | 5,349 | +3.8% | 215 |
| Wałbrzych | 4,564 | -4.2% | 208 |
| Bytom | 4,396 | +6.6% | 326 |
How to read this report
We compare median prices per m² from the three-month period (June ‑ August 2025) with the same months a year earlier to account for seasonality and random fluctuations. The increase and decrease rankings are based on the secondary market (resale flats), as the primary-market median can jump when a developer happens to complete a more or less expensive development. The ranking includes localities with at least 50 secondary-market transactions in the latest period and 30 a year earlier. The data come from the Property Price Register (RCN, Polish official register of real-estate transactions), so they show the prices at which flats were actually sold. County authorities submit deeds with a delay, so we publish the report for a given month once the data are mostly complete and update it during subsequent refreshes. Details: methodology.
When citing, please state the source as: ‘indekscen.pl, based on the Property Price Register’, with a link to this page.