Polski
УкраїнськаFlat prices in in August 2026
The median price of a flat in Poland in June ‑ August 2026 was PLN 9,042/m², 4.9% more than a year earlier. On the secondary market (resale), prices are rising in 75 and falling in 9 of the 107 cities and municipalities (gminas) compared.
Where prices are rising fastest
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Łuków | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 8,622 | +27.4% | 64 |
| 2 | Mosina | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 10,211 | +21.9% | 54 |
| 3 | Ostrów Wielkopolski | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 7,039 | +20.3% | 70 |
| 4 | Ząbkowice Śląskie | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 4,416 | +17.1% | 50 |
| 5 | Kąty Wrocławskie | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 11,575 | +16.9% | 54 |
| 6 | Racibórz | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,465 | +15.9% | 50 |
| 7 | Chrzanów | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 7,014 | +15% | 51 |
| 8 | Kórnik | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 9,470 | +14.1% | 78 |
| 9 | Iława | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 7,869 | +13% | 69 |
| 10 | Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 13,386 | +12.8% | 71 |
| 11 | Ożarów Mazowiecki | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 12,866 | +12.5% | 62 |
| 12 | Przemyśl | Podkarpackie Voivodeship | 6,281 | +12% | 69 |
| 13 | Tarnów | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 7,411 | +11.6% | 108 |
| 14 | Tczew | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 8,078 | +10.9% | 129 |
| 15 | Łomża | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 8,217 | +10.7% | 68 |
Where prices are falling or rising most slowly
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ostróda | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 5,955 | -9.7% | 64 |
| 2 | Ostrołęka | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 7,253 | -6.5% | 54 |
| 3 | Zgorzelec | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 6,060 | -6.3% | 64 |
| 4 | Nowy Sącz | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 6,717 | -4.9% | 65 |
| 5 | Łódź | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 7,667 | -3.7% | 939 |
| 6 | Ząbki | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 12,533 | -2.7% | 52 |
| 7 | Bełchatów | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 5,388 | -2.1% | 73 |
| 8 | Giżycko | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 6,521 | -1.9% | 64 |
| 9 | Jaworzno | Śląskie Voivodeship | 6,156 | -1.7% | 91 |
| 10 | Sopot | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 17,668 | -1.4% | 78 |
| 11 | Słupsk | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,944 | -1.3% | 177 |
| 12 | Żagań | Lubuskie Voivodeship | 4,921 | -1.3% | 54 |
| 13 | Konin | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 5,770 | -1.1% | 125 |
| 14 | Świdnica | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 6,793 | -1.1% | 82 |
| 15 | Gorzów Wielkopolski | Lubuskie Voivodeship | 7,457 | -0.9% | 248 |
Most and least expensive large markets
Localities with at least 100 transactions in June ‑ August 2026.
| Locality | Median PLN/m² | Year on year | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kraków | 15,235 | +4% | 2673 |
| Wrocław | 13,177 | +5.5% | 2926 |
| Gdańsk | 13,027 | +0.5% | 2601 |
| Pruszków | 12,849 | +3.1% | 147 |
| Piaseczno | 12,749 | +8.4% | 368 |
| Gdynia | 12,307 | +5.3% | 857 |
| Poznań | 11,986 | +4.2% | 1591 |
| Ożarów Mazowiecki | 11,703 | +20% | 127 |
| Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | 10,957 | +16.1% | 261 |
| Wieliczka | 10,902 | +15.4% | 125 |
| Rumia | 10,656 | +16% | 299 |
| Kołobrzeg | 10,514 | +1.1% | 200 |
| Szczecin | 10,383 | +4.7% | 1222 |
| Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | 10,239 | +3.8% | 133 |
| Lublin | 10,234 | +0.2% | 694 |
| Opole | 10,130 | +8% | 337 |
| Katowice | 10,116 | +3.8% | 1153 |
| Siedlce | 10,114 | +14.9% | 162 |
| Komorniki municipality (gmina) | 10,047 | +9.8% | 166 |
| Rzeszów | 10,017 | +2.1% | 708 |
| Olsztyn | 9,965 | +11.7% | 753 |
| Toruń | 9,930 | +9.9% | 582 |
| Bielsko-Biała | 9,905 | +21.8% | 428 |
| Białystok | 9,835 | +1.5% | 890 |
| Siechnice | 9,671 | +16.1% | 176 |
| Dopiewo municipality (gmina) | 9,618 | +3.9% | 246 |
| Łódź | 9,348 | +5.7% | 1882 |
| Tarnowo Podgórne municipality (gmina) | 9,290 | +5.5% | 116 |
| Oława | 9,263 | +0.7% | 102 |
| Luboń | 9,198 | +9.5% | 139 |
| Swarzędz | 9,123 | +12.1% | 426 |
| Bydgoszcz | 8,771 | +8.1% | 636 |
| Łuków | 8,624 | -1.2% | 109 |
| Gliwice | 8,519 | +13.4% | 565 |
| Dąbrowa Górnicza | 8,508 | +46.9% | 369 |
| Tczew | 8,462 | +15.1% | 152 |
| Rokietnica municipality (gmina) | 8,404 | +3.3% | 109 |
| Płock | 8,336 | +1.5% | 198 |
| Iława | 8,086 | +16.4% | 107 |
| Kalisz | 8,060 | +18.8% | 173 |
| Łomża | 8,004 | +5.6% | 151 |
| Tychy | 7,920 | +1.3% | 237 |
| Tarnów | 7,864 | +8.3% | 203 |
| Świdnica | 7,744 | +5.1% | 107 |
| Siemianowice Śląskie | 7,743 | +16.2% | 176 |
| Stargard | 7,700 | +6.2% | 271 |
| Gorzów Wielkopolski | 7,616 | +2.9% | 280 |
| Lubin | 7,536 | +3.2% | 218 |
| Malbork | 7,462 | +16.4% | 125 |
| Słupsk | 7,388 | -2.7% | 237 |
| Piła | 7,285 | -8.2% | 160 |
| Tarnowskie Góry | 6,790 | +5.3% | 100 |
| Częstochowa | 6,663 | -0.2% | 350 |
| Legnica | 6,619 | +4.3% | 288 |
| Lębork | 6,603 | +11.6% | 109 |
| Chełm | 6,597 | +12% | 122 |
| Chorzów | 6,457 | +14.2% | 309 |
| Sosnowiec | 6,427 | +11.9% | 374 |
| Jaworzno | 6,302 | -2.4% | 107 |
| Rybnik | 6,182 | +2.1% | 167 |
| Głogów | 6,110 | -1.3% | 143 |
| Świętochłowice | 6,000 | +1.6% | 111 |
| Konin | 5,930 | -3.5% | 141 |
| Inowrocław | 5,810 | +4.5% | 178 |
| Zabrze | 5,609 | -5.9% | 363 |
| Włocławek | 5,527 | -12.1% | 165 |
| Ruda Śląska | 5,506 | +2.9% | 106 |
| Wałbrzych | 4,937 | +8.2% | 196 |
| Bytom | 4,362 | -0.7% | 371 |
How to read this report
We compare median prices per m² from the three-month period (June ‑ August 2026) with the same months a year earlier to account for seasonality and random fluctuations. The increase and decrease rankings are based on the secondary market (resale flats), as the primary-market median can jump when a developer happens to complete a more or less expensive development. The ranking includes localities with at least 50 secondary-market transactions in the latest period and 30 a year earlier. The data come from the Property Price Register (RCN, Polish official register of real-estate transactions), so they show the prices at which flats were actually sold. County authorities submit deeds with a delay, so we publish the report for a given month once the data are mostly complete and update it during subsequent refreshes. Details: methodology.
When citing, please state the source as: ‘indekscen.pl, based on the Property Price Register’, with a link to this page.