Polski
УкраїнськаFlat prices in in November 2025
The median price of a flat in Poland in September ‑ November 2025 was PLN 9,401/m², 8.6% more than a year earlier. On the secondary market (resale), prices are rising in 58 and falling in 23 of the 101 cities and municipalities (gminas) compared.
Where prices are rising fastest
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Września | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 8,299 | +22.6% | 54 |
| 2 | Gniezno | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,667 | +16.8% | 52 |
| 3 | Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 12,581 | +15.8% | 52 |
| 4 | Iława | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 7,522 | +11.9% | 55 |
| 5 | Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 10,845 | +11.2% | 72 |
| 6 | Rumia | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 10,822 | +10.7% | 103 |
| 7 | Malbork | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,456 | +10.7% | 88 |
| 8 | Słupsk | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 7,043 | +10.5% | 206 |
| 9 | Śrem | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 7,093 | +9.7% | 50 |
| 10 | Kalisz | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 7,195 | +9.6% | 101 |
| 11 | Świdnica | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 7,062 | +9.6% | 114 |
| 12 | Brzeg | Opolskie Voivodeship | 6,177 | +9.6% | 84 |
| 13 | Rybnik | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,491 | +8.2% | 91 |
| 14 | Marki | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 11,625 | +7.9% | 66 |
| 15 | Jaworzno | Śląskie Voivodeship | 6,345 | +7.9% | 119 |
Where prices are falling or rising most slowly
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Świętochłowice | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,086 | -9.1% | 78 |
| 2 | Leszno | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,315 | -8.3% | 74 |
| 3 | Szczecinek | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 5,067 | -8.1% | 65 |
| 4 | Piotrków Trybunalski | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 5,670 | -7.1% | 61 |
| 5 | Łomża | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 7,117 | -6.2% | 61 |
| 6 | Chełm | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 5,732 | -6% | 75 |
| 7 | Przemyśl | Podkarpackie Voivodeship | 5,804 | -5.8% | 79 |
| 8 | Ruda Śląska | Śląskie Voivodeship | 4,990 | -5.5% | 194 |
| 9 | Tarnów | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 6,188 | -5.2% | 98 |
| 10 | Ostrów Wielkopolski | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 5,493 | -5% | 70 |
| 11 | Puławy | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 6,507 | -5% | 57 |
| 12 | Świebodzin | Lubuskie Voivodeship | 6,532 | -4.9% | 52 |
| 13 | Wieliczka | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 11,828 | -4.7% | 59 |
| 14 | Wałbrzych | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 4,555 | -4.4% | 235 |
| 15 | Ząbkowice Śląskie | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 4,190 | -4.1% | 51 |
Most and least expensive large markets
Localities with at least 100 transactions in September ‑ November 2025.
| Locality | Median PLN/m² | Year on year | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sopot | 19,750 | -5.6% | 121 |
| Warsaw | 15,498 | -1.1% | 9716 |
| Kraków | 14,555 | +3.7% | 3382 |
| Pruszków | 12,932 | +21.3% | 133 |
| Wrocław | 12,560 | -0.6% | 2547 |
| Gdańsk | 12,509 | +2% | 2523 |
| Gdynia | 11,994 | +8.9% | 595 |
| Piaseczno | 11,677 | +2.6% | 160 |
| Kołobrzeg | 11,086 | +1.3% | 294 |
| Szczecin | 10,800 | +15.6% | 1249 |
| Pruszcz Gdański | 10,757 | -1% | 139 |
| Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | 10,720 | +29.4% | 427 |
| Marki | 10,343 | +12.5% | 155 |
| Lublin | 10,178 | +2.1% | 550 |
| Mińsk Mazowiecki | 10,133 | +3.6% | 163 |
| Wieliczka | 10,112 | -14.2% | 244 |
| Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | 9,970 | +25.1% | 124 |
| Katowice | 9,959 | -2% | 913 |
| Rzeszów | 9,865 | +13.2% | 828 |
| Białystok | 9,845 | +3% | 1606 |
| Siechnice | 9,804 | +25.3% | 111 |
| Toruń | 9,598 | +9.1% | 577 |
| Rumia | 9,561 | +0.9% | 397 |
| Komorniki municipality (gmina) | 9,503 | +18% | 121 |
| Bielsko-Biała | 9,282 | +7.4% | 351 |
| Olsztyn | 9,240 | +8.2% | 644 |
| Opole | 9,173 | +6.6% | 298 |
| Oleśnica | 9,039 | +14.2% | 127 |
| Łódź | 9,000 | +5.3% | 2347 |
| Grodzisk Mazowiecki | 8,945 | -0.9% | 163 |
| Siedlce | 8,916 | -2.3% | 121 |
| Kielce | 8,858 | -2.3% | 428 |
| Gliwice | 8,816 | +28.9% | 551 |
| Swarzędz | 8,590 | +15.5% | 169 |
| Tczew | 8,440 | +19% | 153 |
| Tarnów | 8,432 | +29.2% | 299 |
| Leszno | 8,293 | +6.3% | 159 |
| Płock | 7,951 | +7% | 299 |
| Gniezno | 7,760 | +32.1% | 141 |
| Piła | 7,729 | +11.6% | 183 |
| Łomża | 7,700 | +0.6% | 160 |
| Koszalin | 7,696 | -5.1% | 356 |
| Tychy | 7,692 | -2.7% | 211 |
| Żukowo | 7,648 | -1% | 158 |
| Starogard Gdański | 7,600 | +18.8% | 111 |
| Przemyśl | 7,497 | +17.3% | 138 |
| Świebodzin | 7,471 | +7.7% | 112 |
| Słupsk | 7,437 | +21.1% | 293 |
| Stargard | 7,399 | +4.2% | 229 |
| Częstochowa | 7,365 | +4.9% | 436 |
| Kalisz | 7,200 | +9% | 135 |
| Świdnica | 7,143 | +10.7% | 127 |
| Elbląg | 7,124 | +0.4% | 650 |
| Lubin | 7,076 | +8.4% | 163 |
| Tarnowskie Góry | 6,806 | +9.8% | 117 |
| Radom | 6,737 | -3.7% | 192 |
| Lębork | 6,691 | +5.9% | 140 |
| Nysa | 6,657 | +1.9% | 124 |
| Konin | 6,646 | +6.2% | 290 |
| Chorzów | 6,634 | +6.4% | 232 |
| Nowa Sól | 6,518 | +20.2% | 139 |
| Głogów | 6,510 | +19% | 126 |
| Legnica | 6,483 | +9.7% | 253 |
| Rybnik | 6,459 | +11.4% | 149 |
| Jaworzno | 6,345 | +7.4% | 121 |
| Szczecinek | 6,275 | +11.7% | 111 |
| Świętochłowice | 6,210 | -1.4% | 112 |
| Ostrów Wielkopolski | 6,068 | +5.3% | 146 |
| Mysłowice | 5,995 | -8.2% | 100 |
| Siemianowice Śląskie | 5,858 | +2.6% | 111 |
| Inowrocław | 5,818 | +8.6% | 153 |
| Będzin | 5,647 | -6.4% | 109 |
| Włocławek | 5,597 | -7.6% | 145 |
| Zabrze | 5,502 | +5.2% | 376 |
| Sosnowiec | 5,446 | -7.4% | 294 |
| Dąbrowa Górnicza | 5,426 | -5.6% | 141 |
| Ruda Śląska | 5,120 | -12.6% | 215 |
| Wałbrzych | 5,031 | +2.7% | 287 |
| Bytom | 4,553 | +5.3% | 315 |
How to read this report
We compare median prices per m² from the three-month period (September ‑ November 2025) with the same months a year earlier to account for seasonality and random fluctuations. The increase and decrease rankings are based on the secondary market (resale flats), as the primary-market median can jump when a developer happens to complete a more or less expensive development. The ranking includes localities with at least 50 secondary-market transactions in the latest period and 30 a year earlier. The data come from the Property Price Register (RCN, Polish official register of real-estate transactions), so they show the prices at which flats were actually sold. County authorities submit deeds with a delay, so we publish the report for a given month once the data are mostly complete and update it during subsequent refreshes. Details: methodology.
When citing, please state the source as: ‘indekscen.pl, based on the Property Price Register’, with a link to this page.