Polski
УкраїнськаFlat prices in in February 2026
The median price of a flat in Poland in December 2025 - February 2026 was PLN 9,308/m², 6.1% more than a year earlier. On the secondary market (resale), prices are rising in 54 and falling in 24 of the 101 cities and municipalities (gminas) compared.
Where prices are rising fastest
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Piotrków Trybunalski | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 6,180 | +19.7% | 69 |
| 2 | Pruszków | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 13,407 | +16.6% | 69 |
| 3 | Dobra (Szczecińska) municipality (gmina) | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 8,598 | +16.5% | 63 |
| 4 | Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 10,497 | +15.7% | 61 |
| 5 | Września | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 8,670 | +14.8% | 57 |
| 6 | Gniezno | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,363 | +14.8% | 50 |
| 7 | Nysa | Opolskie Voivodeship | 6,308 | +14.7% | 82 |
| 8 | Siedlce | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 9,202 | +12.4% | 107 |
| 9 | Mysłowice | Śląskie Voivodeship | 6,214 | +11.5% | 76 |
| 10 | Rybnik | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,504 | +10.1% | 89 |
| 11 | Żyrardów | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 8,759 | +9.9% | 51 |
| 12 | Głogów | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 5,667 | +9.8% | 109 |
| 13 | Starogard Gdański | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,662 | +8.9% | 62 |
| 14 | Police | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 8,347 | +7.9% | 52 |
| 15 | Dąbrowa Górnicza | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,904 | +7.8% | 123 |
Where prices are falling or rising most slowly
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sopot | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 17,722 | -10.8% | 81 |
| 2 | Oleśnica | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 7,489 | -8.6% | 70 |
| 3 | Będzin | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,198 | -7.5% | 96 |
| 4 | Świnoujście | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 10,485 | -6.6% | 68 |
| 5 | Kołobrzeg | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 10,295 | -6.5% | 117 |
| 6 | Środa Wielkopolska | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 7,073 | -5.7% | 61 |
| 7 | Pruszcz Gdański | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 10,463 | -5.2% | 71 |
| 8 | Iława | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 6,838 | -5.2% | 53 |
| 9 | Wałbrzych | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 4,444 | -4.8% | 170 |
| 10 | Katowice | Śląskie Voivodeship | 7,930 | -4.5% | 556 |
| 11 | Tarnów | Małopolskie Voivodeship | 6,537 | -4.5% | 122 |
| 12 | Starachowice | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 5,097 | -4.3% | 53 |
| 13 | Słupsk | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,787 | -4% | 169 |
| 14 | Chełm | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 5,582 | -3.7% | 77 |
| 15 | Rumia | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 9,955 | -3.5% | 88 |
Most and least expensive large markets
Localities with at least 100 transactions in December 2025 - February 2026.
| Locality | Median PLN/m² | Year on year | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warsaw | 16,982 | +10.7% | 6375 |
| Kraków | 15,097 | +8.6% | 3627 |
| Pruszków | 13,407 | +18.8% | 125 |
| Ząbki | 12,864 | +8.4% | 101 |
| Gdańsk | 12,836 | -0.8% | 2762 |
| Świnoujście | 12,682 | +10.8% | 118 |
| Wrocław | 12,653 | +5.7% | 3018 |
| Gdynia | 12,130 | +4.2% | 617 |
| Wieliczka | 12,037 | +35.5% | 219 |
| Mińsk Mazowiecki | 11,592 | +24.4% | 166 |
| Kołobrzeg | 11,492 | +14.9% | 240 |
| Piaseczno | 11,388 | +1.8% | 208 |
| Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki | 10,996 | +20.3% | 174 |
| Pruszcz Gdański | 10,782 | -1.8% | 138 |
| Szczecin | 10,698 | +14.2% | 1189 |
| Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | 10,282 | +26.5% | 383 |
| Opole | 10,097 | +10.7% | 334 |
| Rumia | 10,056 | +3.1% | 256 |
| Lublin | 10,045 | -0.8% | 532 |
| Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | 10,034 | +21.2% | 151 |
| Białystok | 10,023 | +9% | 1257 |
| Rzeszów | 9,830 | +4.1% | 1042 |
| Katowice | 9,766 | -2.3% | 956 |
| Toruń | 9,628 | +11.8% | 710 |
| Reda | 9,343 | +0.3% | 219 |
| Siedlce | 9,338 | +11.3% | 140 |
| Kielce | 9,163 | -1.2% | 380 |
| Bielsko-Biała | 9,000 | +6.7% | 307 |
| Olsztyn | 8,956 | +3.9% | 525 |
| Grodzisk Mazowiecki | 8,921 | +8.4% | 155 |
| Łódź | 8,869 | +5.3% | 2485 |
| Płock | 8,709 | +16.1% | 285 |
| Wejherowo | 8,665 | +6.1% | 112 |
| Leszno | 8,594 | +20.1% | 132 |
| Kalisz | 8,168 | -2.8% | 314 |
| Nowy Sącz | 8,143 | +20.9% | 157 |
| Tychy | 8,062 | -6.5% | 235 |
| Tczew | 8,029 | +13.6% | 124 |
| Swarzędz | 8,011 | +10.1% | 109 |
| Piotrków Trybunalski | 7,978 | +43.6% | 196 |
| Żukowo | 7,802 | -3.3% | 154 |
| Częstochowa | 7,799 | +5.8% | 459 |
| Elbląg | 7,733 | +10.4% | 650 |
| Chorzów | 7,641 | +20.3% | 317 |
| Luboń | 7,600 | +9.9% | 133 |
| Gorzów Wielkopolski | 7,582 | +12.1% | 376 |
| Gliwice | 7,519 | +7.6% | 392 |
| Świdnica | 7,500 | +12.9% | 172 |
| Lubin | 7,489 | +8.8% | 194 |
| Słupsk | 7,395 | +3.5% | 249 |
| Stargard | 7,342 | +1.9% | 210 |
| Środa Wielkopolska | 7,332 | +6.6% | 134 |
| Tarnów | 7,307 | +4.2% | 201 |
| Iława | 7,283 | +0.9% | 110 |
| Września | 7,193 | +3.5% | 133 |
| Piła | 7,185 | +18.8% | 126 |
| Malbork | 7,125 | +20.8% | 131 |
| Głogów | 6,900 | +23.9% | 156 |
| Legnica | 6,420 | +0.6% | 229 |
| Ostrów Wielkopolski | 6,161 | -3.5% | 103 |
| Siemianowice Śląskie | 6,144 | -17.8% | 117 |
| Sosnowiec | 6,033 | -11.7% | 362 |
| Dąbrowa Górnicza | 5,945 | +3.5% | 134 |
| Włocławek | 5,923 | +9.6% | 185 |
| Konin | 5,900 | +2.9% | 264 |
| Rybnik | 5,900 | -6.9% | 125 |
| Bełchatów | 5,835 | +8.7% | 120 |
| Inowrocław | 5,694 | +2.8% | 141 |
| Będzin | 5,410 | -3.7% | 106 |
| Zabrze | 5,387 | -10% | 298 |
| Ruda Śląska | 5,356 | +5.5% | 198 |
| Wałbrzych | 4,789 | -0.4% | 193 |
| Bytom | 4,629 | +8.9% | 353 |
How to read this report
We compare median prices per m² from the three-month period (December 2025 - February 2026) with the same months a year earlier to account for seasonality and random fluctuations. The increase and decrease rankings are based on the secondary market (resale flats), as the primary-market median can jump when a developer happens to complete a more or less expensive development. The ranking includes localities with at least 50 secondary-market transactions in the latest period and 30 a year earlier. The data come from the Property Price Register (RCN, Polish official register of real-estate transactions), so they show the prices at which flats were actually sold. County authorities submit deeds with a delay, so we publish the report for a given month once the data are mostly complete and update it during subsequent refreshes. Details: methodology.
When citing, please state the source as: ‘indekscen.pl, based on the Property Price Register’, with a link to this page.