Flat prices in in January 2026
The median price of a flat in Poland in November 2025 - January 2026 was PLN 9,552/m², 8.5% more than a year earlier. On the secondary market (resale), prices are rising in 52 and falling in 20 of the 96 cities and municipalities (gminas) compared.
Where prices are rising fastest
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gniezno | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 6,780 | +24.5% | 55 |
| 2 | Dobra (Szczecińska) municipality (gmina) | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 8,944 | +20.2% | 67 |
| 3 | Pruszków | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 13,955 | +15.5% | 63 |
| 4 | Żyrardów | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 8,479 | +13.4% | 51 |
| 5 | Starogard Gdański | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,655 | +13.2% | 60 |
| 6 | Skarżysko-Kamienna | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 4,672 | +12.3% | 75 |
| 7 | Nysa | Opolskie Voivodeship | 6,218 | +10.3% | 77 |
| 8 | Piotrków Trybunalski | Łódzkie Voivodeship | 5,951 | +9.5% | 57 |
| 9 | Ostrołęka | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 6,695 | +9.5% | 50 |
| 10 | Siedlce | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 9,179 | +9.3% | 92 |
| 11 | Goleniów | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 7,389 | +8.9% | 51 |
| 12 | Inowrocław | Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship | 5,828 | +8.6% | 116 |
| 13 | Rybnik | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,469 | +8.5% | 93 |
| 14 | Malbork | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 6,408 | +8.3% | 70 |
| 15 | Głogów | Lower Silesian voivodeship | 5,579 | +8.1% | 111 |
Where prices are falling or rising most slowly
| # | Locality | Voivodeship | Secondary market median, PLN/m² | Year on year | Resale transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Będzin | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,091 | -9.9% | 107 |
| 2 | Świnoujście | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 10,592 | -9.4% | 70 |
| 3 | Łomża | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 6,790 | -9.2% | 59 |
| 4 | Sopot | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 18,740 | -8.4% | 83 |
| 5 | Zamość | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 6,383 | -7.6% | 51 |
| 6 | Chełm | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 5,451 | -7.2% | 67 |
| 7 | Iława | Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship | 7,261 | -6.7% | 55 |
| 8 | Wejherowo | Pomorskie Voivodeship | 7,985 | -5.3% | 79 |
| 9 | Katowice | Śląskie Voivodeship | 7,860 | -4.3% | 538 |
| 10 | Ostrów Wielkopolski | Wielkopolskie Voivodeship | 5,407 | -3.9% | 66 |
| 11 | Chorzów | Śląskie Voivodeship | 5,595 | -3.8% | 152 |
| 12 | Stargard | Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship | 6,992 | -3.7% | 154 |
| 13 | Puławy | Lubelskie Voivodeship | 6,293 | -3.7% | 57 |
| 14 | Piaseczno | Mazowieckie Voivodeship | 11,689 | -2.9% | 140 |
| 15 | Gliwice | Śląskie Voivodeship | 6,751 | -2.1% | 261 |
Most and least expensive large markets
Localities with at least 100 transactions in November 2025 - January 2026.
| Locality | Median PLN/m² | Year on year | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warsaw | 16,841 | +8.9% | 8928 |
| Kraków | 14,852 | +7.3% | 3799 |
| Pruszków | 13,636 | +21.7% | 116 |
| Gdańsk | 12,706 | -0.8% | 2704 |
| Świnoujście | 12,617 | +7.6% | 119 |
| Wrocław | 12,550 | +1.5% | 2880 |
| Gdynia | 12,367 | +7.7% | 554 |
| Kołobrzeg | 12,159 | +20.1% | 269 |
| Wieliczka | 12,085 | +30.1% | 242 |
| Piaseczno | 11,445 | +2.5% | 189 |
| Szczecin | 10,910 | +18.7% | 1249 |
| Mińsk Mazowiecki | 10,871 | +16.9% | 157 |
| Pruszcz Gdański | 10,852 | -2.7% | 117 |
| Lesznowola municipality (gmina) | 10,527 | +42% | 438 |
| Lublin | 10,075 | -0.7% | 513 |
| Katowice | 9,950 | -2% | 904 |
| Białystok | 9,946 | +2.6% | 1583 |
| Rzeszów | 9,930 | +7.4% | 971 |
| Opole | 9,832 | +9.2% | 300 |
| Pruszcz Gdański municipality (gmina) | 9,811 | +20% | 105 |
| Rumia | 9,743 | +3.3% | 254 |
| Toruń | 9,600 | +12.1% | 710 |
| Siedlce | 9,498 | +7.4% | 134 |
| Siechnice | 9,362 | +14.3% | 124 |
| Reda | 9,352 | +3.3% | 189 |
| Bielsko-Biała | 9,169 | +8.5% | 333 |
| Olsztyn | 9,007 | +5.9% | 492 |
| Kielce | 8,970 | -1.3% | 354 |
| Grodzisk Mazowiecki | 8,815 | +6.4% | 131 |
| Łódź | 8,615 | +0.7% | 2250 |
| Oleśnica | 8,388 | -3% | 113 |
| Tczew | 8,320 | +18.4% | 151 |
| Płock | 8,190 | +7.9% | 273 |
| Wejherowo | 8,113 | -3.9% | 120 |
| Piotrków Trybunalski | 8,081 | +24.1% | 173 |
| Tychy | 8,060 | -6.5% | 237 |
| Swarzędz | 8,053 | +11.2% | 103 |
| Leszno | 8,033 | +9.5% | 129 |
| Żukowo | 7,972 | -1.4% | 166 |
| Częstochowa | 7,903 | +2.5% | 495 |
| Tarnów | 7,897 | +18.7% | 262 |
| Chorzów | 7,707 | +21.6% | 283 |
| Iława | 7,705 | +6.1% | 118 |
| Luboń | 7,607 | +2.1% | 134 |
| Słupsk | 7,573 | +13.8% | 258 |
| Nowy Sącz | 7,509 | +3.9% | 100 |
| Łomża | 7,490 | +0.3% | 112 |
| Kalisz | 7,450 | -11.2% | 213 |
| Stargard | 7,368 | +1.6% | 234 |
| Starogard Gdański | 7,363 | +18.1% | 116 |
| Elbląg | 7,362 | +6.2% | 628 |
| Lubin | 7,333 | +6.5% | 162 |
| Gorzów Wielkopolski | 7,300 | +8.1% | 365 |
| Świdnica | 7,204 | +13.1% | 156 |
| Piła | 7,200 | +15% | 128 |
| Gliwice | 7,194 | +1.9% | 368 |
| Malbork | 7,077 | +20.8% | 131 |
| Głogów | 6,480 | +16.6% | 140 |
| Legnica | 6,291 | +2.1% | 210 |
| Siemianowice Śląskie | 6,136 | +2.5% | 120 |
| Włocławek | 6,070 | +5.5% | 193 |
| Ostrów Wielkopolski | 6,052 | +8.1% | 134 |
| Konin | 5,991 | +7.3% | 232 |
| Dąbrowa Górnicza | 5,947 | +3.3% | 146 |
| Inowrocław | 5,818 | +8.1% | 123 |
| Rybnik | 5,793 | +4% | 125 |
| Sosnowiec | 5,647 | -10.8% | 305 |
| Zabrze | 5,468 | -1.6% | 314 |
| Będzin | 5,396 | -4.6% | 115 |
| Ruda Śląska | 5,159 | -5.1% | 193 |
| Wałbrzych | 4,802 | +2.1% | 190 |
| Bytom | 4,581 | +8.2% | 347 |
How to read this report
We compare median prices per m² from the three-month period (November 2025 - January 2026) with the same months a year earlier to account for seasonality and random fluctuations. The increase and decrease rankings are based on the secondary market (resale flats), as the primary-market median can jump when a developer happens to complete a more or less expensive development. The ranking includes localities with at least 50 secondary-market transactions in the latest period and 30 a year earlier. The data come from the Property Price Register (RCN, Polish official register of real-estate transactions), so they show the prices at which flats were actually sold. County authorities submit deeds with a delay, so we publish the report for a given month once the data are mostly complete and update it during subsequent refreshes. Details: methodology.
When citing, please state the source as: ‘indekscen.pl, based on the Property Price Register’, with a link to this page.